AI Governance Cosplay (And Why Your Identity Layer Is the Real Risk)
New research exposes the gap between AI security confidence and reality. The blast radius isn't model risk, it's at the identity.
Insights & Analysis
Perspectives on cybersecurity, AI risk, and building security programs that actually work — from a team that's done it at scale.
New research exposes the gap between AI security confidence and reality. The blast radius isn't model risk, it's at the identity.
Most cybersecurity firms separate the people who win the business from the people who do the work. We built Sidekick the opposite way — no sales team, no obnoxious outbound sequences. Instead, an invite-only network of trusted security professionals who introduce us because the work reflects well on them. Here's why that model exists and what it unlocks.
Security teams have traditionally organized around technical domains for two decades. But org charts show ownership over tasks and tools, they don't show what breaks when you pull a thread. They usually work against communication patterns, politics, and the layers of dependencies that exist in actual organizations. The Trust Map replaces that inventory with a systems view: twelve domains, mapped dependencies, and a central question most programs aren't structured to answer.
AI pentesting tools are genuinely capable and improving fast. But organizations treating AI in offensive security as a tool evaluation problem — rather than a program design problem — are setting themselves up for incremental gains when transformational ones are possible.
Most organizations treat penetration tests like oil changes: periodic, procedural, and disconnected from everything else. With regulators finally getting specific about what they expect, it's worth asking whether your testing program is delivering strategic value or just generating PDFs.
Your job isn't to maximize security. It's to enable the organization to achieve its mission while managing risk responsibly. Those two things overlap significantly — but they are not the same thing.
Nearly everyone in cybersecurity agrees security questionnaires are broken, but almost no one acts on it. With third-party breaches now accounting for 30–35% of all incidents, the gap between what questionnaires promise and what they deliver isn't just inefficient — it's a meaningful security risk.
Introducing Sidekick Security - expert cybersecurity consulting focused on action, not just recommendations.
Many security programs focus on symptoms rather than root causes. Here's how to break the cycle and build lasting security improvements.